Advertisement Banner
Advertisement Banner

२० शुक्रबार, असार २०८२16th June 2025, 6:20:04 am

CURTAIN RAISER: DPM/FM’s Visit to Hong Kong

१७ शुक्रबार , जेठ २०८२एक महिना अगाडि

CURTAIN RAISER: DPM/FM’s 
Visit to Hong Kong

CURTAIN RAISER: DPM/FM’s Visit to Hong Kong, Special
Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/curtain-raiser-dpmfms-visit-tohong-kong-special-administrative-region-of-the-peoples-republic-ofchina
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar, will visit Hong
Kong, Special Administrative Region of People’s Republic of China, from 29-30 May 2025
to participate in the signing ceremony for the Convention on the establishment of
International Organization for Mediation (IOMed).
The Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister will sign the IOMed Convention and address
the ceremony on 30 May 2025. He will also hold several bilateral engagements on the
sidelines of the meeting.
Pakistan believes that peace and security, as well as global prosperity, can be promoted
and preserved through strict adherence to the principles of the UN Charter, faithful
implementation of UN Security Council resolutions as well as international law. Mediation,
diplomacy, dialogue, and international cooperation constitute important cornerstones of
this comprehensive approach.
Pakistan has joined the IOMed as one of its founding members. Pakistan remains strongly
supportive of the aims and objectives of IOMed, recognizing its potential for mediation as
well as peaceful and pacific settlement of international disputes.
Islamabad
28 May 2025
153/2025
Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Recent Remarks by
the Prime Minister of India
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-ministry-offoreign-affairs-on-the-recent-remarks-by-the-prime-minister-of-india-2
It is regrettable, though not entirely unexpected, that the Indian Prime Minister has, once
again, set aside the ongoing project of historical revisionism and the internal repression of
minorities to deliver yet another inflammatory monologue. His references to weaponizing
water, a shared, treaty-bound resource, reflect a troubling departure from international
norms and a stark contrast between India’s conduct in the region and its declared global
ambitions. A leadership truly in pursuit of international respect might first look inward, and
seek to cleanse its conscience before issuing threats to others.
The Indian government is linked to extraterritorial assassinations and foreign subversion.
India is in occupation of foreign people and territories. Its record in Indian Illegally Occupied
Jammu and Kashmir is defined by systematic repression. It is ironic that such a state now
attempts to claim the mantle of victimhood.
The ideological followers of India's current government have normalized mob violence,
promoted hate campaigns and targeted religious minorities. Such acts may serve domestic
optics but cannot withstand international scrutiny. Nor do they inspire confidence in India’s
image as a responsible regional power.
Pakistan urges India to return to the core principles of international order including respect
for sovereign rights of others and its treaty obligations, as well as restraint in both language
and action. Jingoism may stir applause on the campaign trail, but it undermines long-term
peace and stability. India’s youth, often the first casualty of chauvinistic nationalism, would
do well to reject the politics of fear and instead work toward a future defined by dignity,
reason, and regional cooperation.
Islamabad
28 May 2025
152/2025
Pakistan Strongly Condemns Israeli Provocative Actions related to the
Al-Aqsa Mosque and Targeting of a School
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-strongly-condemnsisraeli-provocative-actions-related-to-the-al-aqsa-mosque-andtargeting-of-a-school
Pakistan condemns in the strongest possible terms the latest provocative actions by Israeli
occupying power as well as illegal settlers that aim to undermine the religious, historical
and legal status of the Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Such actions are unacceptable and constitute a flagrant violation of the international law,
and have the potential to further escalate an already volatile situation in the region.
Pakistan calls for upholding the sanctity and historical status of the holy sites, and
preventing Israel from any further provocations.
Pakistan also strongly deplores the continued targeting of the Palestinian civilians in Gaza
by the occupying power. The latest reprehensible attack against a school sheltering
displaced families in Gaza is an example of continued Israeli impunity. The harrowing
images being witnessed by the world in the aftermath of the attack that resulted in dozens
of deaths, many of them children, should be a wake-up call for the international community.
These attacks must end forthwith, and Israel must be held accountable for its heinous
crimes.
Pakistan reiterates its unwavering support for the Palestinian people's right to selfdetermination and calls for the establishment of an independent, viable and contiguous
Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital.
Islamabad
27 May 2025
151/2025
Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Recent Remarks by
the Prime Minister of India
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-ministry-offoreign-affairs-on-the-recent-remarks-by-the-prime-minister-of-india
Pakistan has taken note of the recent remarks by the Prime Minister of India, delivered in
Gujarat with the theatrical flourish of a campaign rally rather than the sobriety expected of
the leader of a nuclear-armed state. The hate-driven invocation of violence in his remarks
is deeply disturbing, not only for its content but for the dangerous precedent it sets in a
region already burdened by volatility. We regret the continued erosion of maturity and
decorum in Indian statecraft.
Such statements blatantly violate the fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter,
which obliges member states to resolve disputes peacefully and to refrain from the threat
or use of force against the sovereignty or political independence of other states.
Pakistan views these remarks as a reckless provocation, intended to distract from the
ongoing human rights abuses and demographic engineering in Indian Illegally Occupied
Jammu & Kashmir.
Pakistan’s record as a leading contributor to UN peacekeeping and its consistent
cooperation in global counter-terrorism efforts speak louder than any hostile soundbite. If
extremism is indeed a concern for the Indian government, it would do well to turn inward—
toward the alarming rise of majoritarianism, religious intolerance, and the systematic
disenfranchisement of minorities under the increasingly brutal Hindutva ideology.
Pakistan remains committed to peace based on mutual respect and sovereign equality.
However, any threat to its security or territorial integrity will be met with firm and
proportionate measures, in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter.
The international community must take serious note of India’s escalating rhetoric, which
undermines regional stability and the prospects for lasting peace.
Islamabad
27 May 2025
150/2025
Curtain Raiser: Prime Minister's Visit to Turkiye, Iran, Azerbaijan and
Tajikistan
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/curtain-raiser-prime-ministers-visitto-turkiye-iran-azerbaijan-and-tajikistan
The Prime Minister of Pakistan, Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif, is embarking on a visit to
Turkiye, Iran, Azerbaijan and Tajikistan from 25-30 May 2025.
During the visit, the Prime Minister will have wide-ranging discussions with the leaders of
these countries on an entire range of issues covering bilateral relations and matters of
regional and international importance. He will also have the opportunity to express the
deepest appreciation and acknowledgment for the support extended to Pakistan by the
friendly countries during the recent crisis with India.
The Prime Minister will also be attending the International Conference on Glaciers in
Dushanbe, Tajikistan, to be held on 29-30 May 2025.
Islamabad
24 May 2025
149/2025
Transcript of the Media Briefing by the Spokesperson on Friday, 23rd
May 2025
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/transcript-of-the-media-briefing-bythe-spokesperson-on-friday-23rd-may-2025
Assalam-o-Alaikum,
Welcome to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
I welcome you all at the weekly press briefing.
Pakistan categorically rejects the baseless, provocative, and irresponsible allegations
made by the Indian Prime Minister during a recent public address in Rajasthan.
The remarks, replete with distortions, misrepresentations, and inflammatory rhetoric, are
clearly aimed at stoking regional tensions for narrow political gains.
Such statements not only reflect a deliberate attempt to mislead the public but also violate
the norms of responsible statecraft. Resorting to threats and boasting about military action
against a sovereign nation is a grave breach of the United Nations Charter and established
principles of international law. This dangerous approach undermines regional peace and
stability.
Pakistan remains a consistent and proactive partner in the global fight against terrorism.
Any insinuation seeking to associate Pakistan with acts of terrorism is factually incorrect
and patently misleading. It is a tactic often employed to divert attention from India’s own
internal challenges, as well as its repressive policies in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu
and Kashmir (IIOJK).
India’s attempts to mask its serious human rights violations are well-documented and wellrecognized by the international community. The plight of the Kashmiri people and their just
struggle for self-determination cannot be obscured by aggressive rhetoric and political
deflection.
Pakistan urges the Indian leadership to exercise responsibility and restraint. Escalatory
statements and belligerent posturing serve no purpose other than exacerbating tensions.
Rather than resorting to fictitious narratives and warmongering for electoral mileage, India
should demonstrate maturity by resolving outstanding disputes through peaceful dialogue
and diplomacy.
Pakistan remains firmly committed to peaceful coexistence, regional stability, and
constructive engagement. However, our desire for peace should not be misconstrued as
weakness. The people of Pakistan and its armed forces are fully prepared and capable of
defending the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Any misadventure or aggression will be met with a resolute and proportionate response.
Pakistan has demonstrated its resolve in the past and will do so again, if required.
The international community must take serious note of India’s aggressive posture and
hate-driven narratives that threaten regional peace. It is imperative to discourage such
rhetoric and actions to preserve stability in South Asia. Glorification of conflict benefits no
one, and the path to lasting peace lies in dialogue, mutual respect, and adherence to
international law.
Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif held telephone conversations with the
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, and President of the Arab
Republic of Egypt, Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi.
While strongly condemning India’s unprovoked attacks against Pakistan that led to
martyrdom of innocent civilians, including women and children, the Prime Minister
highlighted Pakistan’s valiant Armed Forces’ responsible, measured yet befitting and
forceful reply to the enemy. He reaffirmed Pakistan’s firm resolve to defend its sovereignty
and territorial integrity at all costs. He also expressed his concern over India’s attempt to
unilaterally hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance and emphasized that Jammu and
Kashmir dispute remains the root cause of instability in South Asia.
Developments in the Middle East, particularly the alarming situation in Gaza, were also
discussed. The PM urged the international community to ensure consistent and timely
delivery of humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza. He also hoped that the
upcoming UN Conference on Two-State Solution next month would yield meaningful
outcomes.
On the invitation of the Foreign Minister of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Yi,
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar, undertook an
official visit to Beijing from 19 to 21 May 2025.
During the visit, the Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister held in-depth discussions with
the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, and Minister of International Department of the
Communist Party of China (IDCPC), Liu Jianchao, on the evolving regional situation in
South Asia and its implications for peace and stability.
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar, Member of the
CPC Political Bureau & Foreign Minister of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Yi, and
Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan, Amir Khan Muttaqi, also held an informal trilateral
meeting during the visit in Beijing. During the visit, the Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign
Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar also held meeting with Afghanistan’s Acting
Foreign Minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, in Beijing.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has firmly rejected the unfounded allegations circulating in
certain segments of the Indian media, which falsely claim that Pakistan employed the
Shaheen missile during Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos (BM).
These claims originated following the release of a video by the Indian Army’s official
Twitter handle, purportedly showing the use of Pakistan’s Shaheen missile. Upon realizing
that the claim was unsubstantiated, the Indian Army promptly deleted the misleading video.
However, by then, sections of the Indian media had already amplified the false narrative
without verification. Regrettably, some Indian outlets continue to propagate this
misinformation.
Disseminating unverified and inflammatory content not only undermines regional stability
but also reflects poorly on the professionalism of official institutions.
Pakistan categorically rejects the allegations that Pakistan attempted to target the Golden
Temple, the most revered place in the Sikh faith. We hold all places of worship in the
highest esteem and cannot think of targeting a holy site like the Golden Temple.
In fact, it was India that targeted different places of worship in Pakistan in the intervening
night of 6 and 7 May 2025. The allegations leveled by the Indian side cannot shift attention
from this unacceptable act.
Pakistan is the proud custodian of many holy sites of the Sikh faith. Every year, it
welcomes thousands of Sikh pilgrims from across the world. Pakistan also provides visafree access to the Gurdwara Sahib Kartarpur through the Kartarpur Corridor. In that
backdrop, any claim concerning Pakistan’s attempt to target the Golden Temple is
absolutely baseless and incorrect.
Pakistan condemns in the strongest possible terms the continued Israeli aggression in
Gaza, resulting in the deaths of dozens of Palestinians, as well as deliberate targeting of
hospitals and other critical infrastructure, along with mass evacuation orders.
The expansion of Israeli ground operations in Gaza, as well as its announcement to “take
control of all” of Gaza, poses a grave threat to efforts aimed towards achieving peace and
stability in the region. In addition, Israel also continues to deliberately obstruct critical
humanitarian aid from reaching millions in dire need. Pakistan reiterates its call on the
international community for an immediate end to Israel’s genocidal campaign, and to
ensure a lasting ceasefire in Gaza. It also urges concrete steps towards provision of
unimpeded humanitarian supplies to millions of Palestinians in dire need, as well as to hold
Israel accountable for its egregious crimes.
Furthermore, Pakistan reiterates its unequivocal opposition to any attempts to displace
the Palestinians from their ancestral lands, expand illegal Israeli settlements or to annex
any part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
I thank you.
***
(Muhammad Saleh Zaafir, The News): Sir, the statements which are emanating from India,
they are talking of belligerency, and it's very satisfying that ceasefire is holding. Don't you
think that this sort of rhetoric could harm the atmosphere in which this ceasefire is existing,
and what is your assessment that when that stage can come, when the two countries will
engage with each other on the table?
Spokesperson: About the first question, Sir what you are saying is absolutely correct and
unexceptionable. At a time of heightened tensions in the region, it is highly imprudent to
indulge in this kind of rhetoric, which is inflammatory and provocative. We have cautioned
India on repeated occasions to desist from this. With regards to ceasefire, ceasefire is
holding, and we are fully committed to it. Lastly, with regards to the third part of your
question, we are engaging in the whole process in good faith. We approach this with
positivity and are committed to make this ceasefire continue to hold, de-escalation to
succeed and then engagement to lead to stability and resolution of issues. We will remain
committed to that. But if this rhetoric is a prelude to any threat in the region, our armed
forces are ready to deal with any eventuality.
(Zeeshan Syed, Neo TV): Sir, can you share some information regarding the expected
visit of the Prime Minister to Iran, about hostilities between Pakistan and India? Details of
the delegation accompanying the Prime Minister? Secondly, would it be a bilateral visit or
similar to our latest visit to China during which some important agreements were
concluded? Or would this visit be just regarding the situation between Pakistan and India?
Spokesperson: We will issue a statement regarding Prime Minister’s visit in due course.
Overall, we have been engaging with all countries, including Iran, which is a friend and an
important neighbor. We have kept them informed about the developments in the region,
just like we have informed other friendly countries including Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Qatar,
UAE and Gulf Cooperation Council.
(Raziq Mahmood Bhatti, Daily Kashmir Express): Sir, even after ceasefire the issue of
water remains. Even today the water is suspended. Your comments on this?
Secondly, the situation for the people of IIOJK has worsened even more as the citizens
are being abducted and shahadas are increasing each day. Have you discussed about this
situation at any forum?
Spokesperson: About Indus Water Treaty, we have continued to highlight our principled
position on many occasions. There is no provision in the Indus Water Treaty which can
allow for suspension or abrogation of the Treaty unilaterally and we will continue to work
with the international community to highlight the perils involved in India pursuing this
course of action. We would work to ensure Pakistan continues to receive its rightful share
of the water under the Indus Water Treaty.
Human rights violations in IIOJK are becoming increasingly visible to the international
community. We have been highlighting this issue, particularly after this recent Pahalgam
incident. We also have seen an uptick in the repression by occupying Indian armed forces,
inside Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir and we would continue to raise these
issues, highlight the gravity of human rights violations in IIOJK to the International
Community.
(Zeeshan Yousafzai, Dunya TV): Sir, can you tell us about the mandate of the Committee
constituted by the Prime Minister under the leadership of Bilawal Bhutto Zardari? Details
including like when will the committee start working, countries of their visit?
Spokesperson: Decision has been taken in principle but there are certain details which
are currently being worked out in terms of the logistics, dates, timings etc. As soon as
details are firmed up, we will share with you.
(Anwer Abbas, 24 News HD): Sir, India is persistent in its decision of revoking Indus Waters
Treaty. In this situation, can Pakistan approach the World Bank which is a guarantor? Will
the Foreign Office approach the World Bank directly or via Indus Water Commissioner?
Secondly, if India persists on its claims, would Pakistan be able to claim its rights on all
five rivers?
Spokesperson: On the Indus Waters Treaty, our position remains very clear. After the
National Security Committee’s meeting, Pakistan's position was articulated with great
clarity that we will continue to work to ensure that Pakistan continues to receive the rightful
share of its waters. There are six rivers on the Indus Basin, not five rivers. There is no legal
provision in the treaty which allows any of the parties to abrogate it unilaterally or suspend
or amend. This is completely illegal on India’s part. Pakistan will continue to work to ensure
to secure Pakistan's rights on its rightful share.
(Anas Mallick, Capital TV): Quick follow up on the Indus Water Treaty. Sir, since you have
mentioned that Pakistan will do what it takes to safeguard its water. Does Pakistan plan
on invoking Article (9) of the Treaty, a provision to take the other party to the court of
arbitration? Is there any such measure as India has been saying it constantly that it will
continue to hold the Treaty in abeyance.
Spokesperson: I forgot to answer Anwar Saab's last part of the question regarding, if
required, who would approach the World Bank, Indus Water Commission, or the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs: It would be the Government of Pakistan.
About your question sir, things are under discussion. We will share details once finalized.
(Azaz Syed, Geo News): Sir, during the Pakistan India standoff, we read the reports about
closure of Kartarpur corridor. What is the latest status of the corridor? Are we going to
reopen it?
Spokesperson: This is a very important question, thank you for raising this. Pakistan has
never closed the Kartarpur corridor despite recent hostilities with India. However, the
Indian side is not allowing pilgrims to avail the pilgrimage facility since 7th May 2025. As
always, we are ready to welcome the pilgrims from the Indian side. As far as Pakistan is
concerned, Kartarpur corridor stays open.
(Tahir Khan, NNI News Agency): Sir, yesterday I asked a question during the Press
Conference of the DPM/FM about up-gradation of relations with Afghanistan and the
response gave the impression that there would be a due process regarding this
development. I cannot recall if any such thing has happened in the past like through
Charge‘d Affaires or not. How much time will the due process take? Additionally, what is
this due process?
Spokesperson: Sir, what the Deputy Prime Minister meant was that it requires our own
internal consultations. Inter-Ministerial Consultations are ongoing. After consultations with
all relevant Departments and Ministries, we will firm up our position about when and how
to go ahead. The Embassies in both capitals are working at the level of Charge d’ Affairs
and diplomatic channels are open. The two Governments are in touch with each other at
multiple levels. I want to further highlight that just because the Embassies are not working
at the Ambassadorial level, it does not mean that our diplomatic interaction is impaired in
any way. We have very robust interactions going on with the Afghan side.
(Shaukat Piracha, Aaj News): After the recently held Pakistan-Afghanistan-China trilateral
meeting, it was the Chinese side which said that Pakistan and Afghanistan, have agreed
in principle to elevate the representation level. We know that Charge’d Affairs are working
in both the countries. When Pakistan sends its full Ambassador and receives a full
Ambassador, will it then be equated to recognition of the Taliban Government in Kabul?
My second question is that obviously a threat remains of escalation again between India
and Pakistan, and the threat perception is real and genuine. At a time when the ceasefire
is in effect, these threatening statements continue to emanate from India, when there were
interlocutors involved who managed the ceasefire, I am talking of the State Department,
Marco Rubio, JD Vance and President Trump. Whether they are being approached that
we are maintaining this ceasefire, but India is determined to harm it? Is there any diplomatic
activity going on? Thank you.
Spokesperson: About the first question, because it is a hypothetical question at this point
in time, but I agree with you that the two sides in principle have agreed to elevate the
relations but we need a bit of more time for inter-ministerial consultations, which are going
on. So, I am not in a position to answer what that means. So this is a question of law, but
I need to consult our legal division on that.
About the ceasefire, what I can say is that there are three aspects to it. Number one,
ceasefire is holding and it is working. The two militaries have a channel of communication
through the Directors General of Military Operations, through which they are working for
de-escalation, in terms of the movement of troops. The third point is that about the rhetoric
and the statements, these are most regrettable. In terms of our position, I can state that
Pakistan remains committed to ceasefire announced on 10th May 2025 and lately, both
sides have taken steps for de-escalation and return of stability. However, we have made it
clear that Pakistan will respond in a befitting manner in case India takes any aggressive
action once again. So this basically sums up our position.
(Memoona Saleem, Khyber News): Sir, President Donald Trump has made a comment
during his press interaction at the White House that US is concerned due to fragile peace
between India and Pakistan. It has also played role of a mediator to de-escalate the
tensions between the two countries. Furthermore, he also talked about a transactional
diplomacy, and said that they have started negotiations with India regarding trade, and
soon they would start negotiations with Pakistan. So has this initiative been taken from the
US side?
Spokesperson: First about the broader US role, we welcome that it has played a very
positive and important role in managing these hostilities when the region was at the cusp
of a very dangerous situation. We appreciate the proactive role played by President Trump
and his administration in brokering the ceasefire agreement between Pakistan and India.
Pakistan remains committed to faithful implementation of ceasefire, notwithstanding the
violations being committed by India in terms of the rhetoric, the spirit of the ceasefire, but
we remain committed. As I mentioned earlier, the ceasefire continues to hold.
About trade, what I can say is that the United States, even before the crisis, was our
biggest export destination. Historically, it has been a very important trading partner with
us. After the US move to impose sanctions at a global scale, there are active consultations
going on within our government under the directive of the Prime Minister, so in the terms
of details the Ministry of Commerce can guide you on that.
(Zeeshan Syed, Neo TV): Sir, regarding the committee under the supervision of Bilawal
Zardari which PM formed on Pak-India tensions, news emerged yesterday that committee
has been bifurcated. Hina Rabbani Khar will lead one half of the delegation to the US and
Bilawal Zardari will lead the delegation in European countries. Did the committee inform
Foreign Ministry about it or is the committee independent or this committee will receive
directions from the Foreign Ministry and then it will lay out a plan and implement it?
Spokesperson: As I explained earlier also during the briefing, we are working on it. Things
are being firmed up. As soon as it is finalized and settled, we will brief you.
(Asif Shahzad, Reuter): You just said that the DG (MO)s are working on bringing the troops
back to de-escalation position. Can you please elaborate a little more? What does that
mean? Does that mean bringing back forces to peace time position? And if so, there are
no fears of any more escalation from the Indian side?
Spokesperson: First step is de-escalation. What I meant was once a ceasefire takes place,
the second step is de-escalation. De-escalation entails a number of steps. It is a complex
process. So, both the militaries are in touch. I will refer you to ISPR for more details on
that.
(Abdullah Mohmand, DAWN News): Indian media has reported that the Indigo flight which
was flying from New Dehli to Srinagar was denied entry into Pakistan after the flight was
caught suddenly in a hailstorm, and the entry was denied by the Lahore Air Traffic Control
Authority. What is your take on this?
Spokesperson: I have seen the news report. We are getting in touch with the concerned
department, and as soon as we receive feedback, I will share it with you. I can just state
the basic facts right now i.e. the Pakistani airspace is closed for Indian aircraft. But
regarding the details of this incident, we are in the process of collecting facts, particularly
from the concerned department. So as soon as we have information, we will share it with
you.
(Azaz Syed, Geo News): As you mentioned that DGMOs from both sides are in touch.
When we are going to hold the flag meetings on the Line of Control and on the working
boundary?
Spokesperson: About this, I am not in a position to give you a definite response. ISPR is
the right forum for that. Normally DGMO is a senior channel which takes a holistic view of
things. Any incidents that take place, DGMO look at the picture comprehensively. So
particularly after this Indian aggression and our subsequent response, the two DGMOs
have been working, as this channel was effective to work out the ceasefire. So they are
working, but for details, I will refer you to ISPR.
(Syeda Qurat ul Ain Shirazi, Independent Urdu): There were reports regarding Pakistan
extending the airspace ban for Indian flights by another month. So it was run by news
sources two days ago. Can you please confirm or deny this news?
Spokesperson: I have no comments on that. I have no information on that, but I will check
and I will get back to you. Just like this earlier question by Mohmand Saab, we are in the
process of gathering information, but as far as we are concerned, so far, our airspace is
closed for Indian aircrafts.
(Aftab Jahan, News One TV): Previously a question was asked to Foreign Minister in
which he stated that for Afghan immigrants, ‘One Document Regime’ is going to be
introduced in which visa will be given to them for a year priced at $100. I want to clarify my
confusion on this. Will ‘One Document Regime’ also be applied to Afghan immigrants who
are living in Pakistan and are in the process of repatriation or it will be applicable on those
Afghan citizens who want to come to Pakistan? Thank you.
Spokesperson: I need to check on this. I want to be sure when I answer you on this.
Thank you.
Pakistan Categorically Rejects the Baseless, Provocative, and
Irresponsible Allegations made by the Indian Prime Minister
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-categorically-rejects-thebaseless-provocative-and-irresponsible-allegations-made-by-theindian-prime-minister
Pakistan categorically rejects the baseless, provocative, and irresponsible allegations
made by the Indian Prime Minister during a recent public address in Rajasthan.
The remarks, replete with distortions, misrepresentations, and inflammatory rhetoric, are
clearly aimed at stoking regional tensions for narrow political gains.
Such statements not only reflect a deliberate attempt to mislead the public but also violate
the norms of responsible statecraft. Resorting to threats and boasting about military action
against a sovereign nation is a grave breach of the United Nations Charter and established
principles of international law. This dangerous approach undermines regional peace and
stability.
Pakistan remains a consistent and proactive partner in the global fight against terrorism.
Any insinuation seeking to associate Pakistan with acts of terrorism is factually incorrect
and patently misleading. It is a tactic often employed to divert attention from India’s own
internal challenges, as well as its repressive policies in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu
and Kashmir (IIOJK).
India’s attempts to mask its serious human rights violations are well-documented and wellrecognized by the international community. The plight of the Kashmiri people and their just
struggle for self-determination cannot be obscured by aggressive rhetoric and political
deflection.
Pakistan urges the Indian leadership to exercise responsibility and restraint. Escalatory
statements and belligerent posturing serve no purpose other than exacerbating tensions.
Rather than resorting to fictitious narratives and warmongering for electoral mileage, India
should demonstrate maturity by resolving outstanding disputes through peaceful dialogue
and diplomacy.
Pakistan remains firmly committed to peaceful coexistence, regional stability, and
constructive engagement. However, our desire for peace should not be misconstrued as
weakness. The people of Pakistan and its armed forces are fully prepared and capable of
defending the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Any misadventure or aggression will be met with a resolute and proportionate response.
Pakistan has demonstrated its resolve in the past and will do so again, if required.
The international community must take serious note of India’s aggressive posture and
hate-driven narratives that threaten regional peace. It is imperative to discourage such
rhetoric and actions to preserve stability in South Asia. Glorification of conflict benefits no
one, and the path to lasting peace lies in dialogue, mutual respect, and adherence to
international law.
Islamabad
23 May 2025
148/2025
Statement by the Spokesperson in Response to a Media Query
Regarding Remarks Made by Former US National Security Advisor,
John Bolton, Concerning Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s
Statement on Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-spokesperson-inresponse-to-a-media-query-regarding-remarks-made-by-former-usnational-security-advisor-john-bolton-concerning-indian-defenceminister-rajnath-singhs-statement-on-pakistans-nuclear-weapons
In response to a media query regarding remarks made by former US National Security
Advisor, John Bolton, to an Indian media outlet, concerning Defence Minister Rajnath
Singh’s statement on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, the Spokesperson of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs issued the following statement:
"Pakistan remains fully confident in the strength of its comprehensive nuclear security
regime and the robustness of its command and control structures.
It is ironic that John Bolton’s remarks were prompted by a statement from Rajnath Singh—
a leader affiliated with a Hindu extremist organization, known for repeatedly issuing threats
of aggression against Pakistan.
In reality, the international community should be more concerned about India’s nuclear
arsenal being controlled by individuals like Rajnath Singh, who harbor well-documented
hostility toward Pakistan and Muslims, and exhibit dangerous delusions of grandeur.
The escalating radicalization of India’s political landscape, media, and segments of its
society raises legitimate nuclear security concerns. These concerns are further
exacerbated by the persistence of a nuclear black market in India, highlighting serious
deficiencies in its nuclear security framework—as evidenced by recurring incidents of theft
and illicit trafficking of sensitive nuclear materials."
Islamabad
22 May 2025
Trilateral Meeting between the Foreign Ministers of Pakistan, China,
and Afghanistan
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/trilateral-meeting-between-theforeign-ministers-of-pakistan-china-and-afghanistan
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister of Pakistan, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar,
Member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and
Foreign Minister of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Yi, and Acting Foreign Minister
of Afghanistan, Amir Khan Muttaqi, held a trilateral meeting today in Beijing.
The three Foreign Ministers held a wide-ranging and constructive dialogue to deepen
cooperation through enhanced communication and mutual trust. They reaffirmed the
importance of the trilateral platform in supporting regional peace, development, and in
advancing their strategic vision for regional connectivity.
Welcoming the recent improvements in Afghanistan’s security environment, they
recognised robust economic linkages and connectivity as essential prerequisites for
regional growth and prosperity. They also highlighted the significance of continued
diplomatic engagement and practical cooperation under the trilateral framework.
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to promoting
close, cooperative ties with Afghanistan, especially in trade, transit, health, and
connectivity.
China and Pakistan reiterated their support for extending the China-Pakistan Economic
Corridor (CPEC) to Afghanistan under the broader framework of the Belt and Road
Initiative (BRI) cooperation. China expressed support for Pakistan and Afghanistan in
safeguarding their territorial integrity, sovereignty, and national dignity.
Recognising the importance of eradicating terrorism and external threats from the region
as necessary to achieve economic and connectivity objectives, all sides agreed to enhance
security cooperation to promote peace and stability. They reiterated their stance against
terrorism in all its forms and manifestations.
It was agreed that the 6th Trilateral Foreign Ministers’ Meeting would be held in Kabul at
an early, mutually convenient date.
Islamabad
21 May 2025
146/2025
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister's Meeting with the Minister of
International Department of the Communist Party of China
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/deputy-prime-ministerforeignministers-meeting-with-the-minister-of-international-department-of-thecommunist-party-of-china
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar, met today with the
Minister of the International Department of the Communist Party of China (IDCPC), Liu
Jianchao.
During the meeting, the two sides discussed regional situation following the ceasefire
between Pakistan and India, and stressed adherence to the principles and purposes of the
UN Charter and international law for maintaining regional peace and stability.
Appreciating China’s support to Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, the Deputy
Prime Minister/Foreign Minister reiterated Pakistan’s commitment to a peaceful
neighbourhood while affirming its right and capability to defend its territory and people.
The DPM/FM underlined the need for the international community to take note of India’s
unilateral and illegal decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance. He
stressed that the resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, in accordance with UN
Security Council resolutions, remains vital for lasting peace in South Asia.
Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister appreciated IDCPC’s instrumental role in
facilitating exchanges between the CPC and political parties of Pakistan.
In view of the 74th anniversary of the establishment of Pakistan-China diplomatic ties being
celebrated on 21 May 2025, both sides underlined the unique nature of the Pakistan-China
friendship and agreed to continue endeavouring for passing it on to the younger generation
of the two countries.
20 May 2025
Islamabad
143/2025
Statement by the Spokesperson in Response to Media Queries
Regarding the Remarks Made by a Senior Indian Army Officer
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-spokesperson-inresponse-to-media-queries-regarding-the-remarks-made-by-a-seniorindian-army-officer
Responding to the media queries regarding the remarks made by a senior Indian Army
officer that Pakistan attempted to target the Golden Temple through drones and missiles
on the intervening night of 7 and 8 May 2025, the Spokesperson said:
“We categorically reject the allegations that Pakistan attempted to target the Golden
Temple, the most revered place in the Sikh faith. We hold all places of worship in the
highest esteem and cannot think of targeting a holy site like the Golden Temple.
In fact, it was India that targeted different places of worship in Pakistan in the intervening
night of 6 and 7 May 2025. The allegations levelled by the Indian side cannot shift attention
from this unacceptable act.
Pakistan is the proud custodian of many holy sites of the Sikh faith. Every year, it welcomes
thousands of Sikh pilgrims from across the world. Pakistan also provides visa-free access
to the Gurdwara Sahib Kartarpur through the Kartarpur Corridor. In that backdrop, any
claim concerning Pakistan’s attempt to target the Golden Temple is absolutely baseless
and incorrect."
Islamabad
20 May 2025
Statement by the Spokesperson in Response to Indian Media’s
Baseless Claims Regarding Pakistan’s Use of Shaheen Missile in
Operation Bunyanun Marsoos (BM)
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-spokesperson-inresponse-to-indian-medias-baseless-claims-regarding-pakistans-useof-shaheen-missile-in-operation-bunyanun-marsoos-bm
In response to Indian Media’s baseless claims regarding Pakistan’s use of Shaheen missile
in Operation Bunyanun Marsoos (BM), the Spokesperson has stated:
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has firmly rejected the unfounded allegations circulating in
certain segments of the Indian media, which falsely claim that Pakistan employed the
Shaheen missile during Operation Bunyanun Marsoos (BM).
These claims originated following the release of a video by the Indian Army’s official Twitter
handle, purportedly showing the use of Pakistan’s Shaheen missile. Upon realizing that
the claim was unsubstantiated, the Indian Army promptly deleted the misleading video.
However, by then, sections of the Indian media had already amplified the false narrative
without verification. Regrettably, some Indian outlets continue to propagate this
misinformation.
It is noteworthy that the Indian Army’s official handle has remained silent on the matter,
offering neither clarification nor retraction for the erroneous post.
Analysts observe that such disinformation campaigns are part of a deliberate attempt to
obscure India’s setbacks in Operation Sindoor, which were a result of Pakistan’s
demonstrated conventional military capabilities. Additionally, these fabricated stories align
with New Delhi’s ongoing efforts to promote a misleading narrative regarding the ceasefire
and baseless allegations of so-called "nuclear blackmail" by Pakistan.
The range of weapons used by Pakistan is detailed in the ISPR press release dated 12
May 2025. The Pakistan Armed Forces employed precision-guided, long-range Fatah
series missiles—F1 and F2—as well as advanced munitions, highly capable long-range
loitering killer drones, and precision long-range artillery. The military sites in India and in
IIOJ&K targeted by these assets are also listed in the ISPR Press Release of 12th May.
Disseminating unverified and inflammatory content not only undermines regional stability
but also reflects poorly on the professionalism of official institutions.
Islamabad
19 May 2025
Transcript of the Weekly Media Briefing by the Spokesperson on
Friday, 16th May 2025
https://pakungeneva.pk/transcript-of-the-weekly-media-briefing-by-thespokesperson-on-friday-16th-may-2025/
As you are aware, the past few weeks have seen heightened tensions between Pakistan
and India. These tensions escalated into active hostilities following India’s aggression
against Pakistan on 7 May 2025. It is deeply regrettable that India’s actions set a
dangerous precedent for unilateral aggression, pushing the entire region to the brink of a
disaster. Our armed forces were fully prepared and responded decisively, shooting down
six Indian Air Force fighter aircraft. The Pakistan Air Force acted strictly in accordance with
its mandate: to target Indian aircraft that either violated Pakistan’s airspace or discharged
their payload against Pakistani territory.
In light of India’s unrelenting aggression, Pakistan was compelled to exercise its right to
self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial
integrity. Accordingly, in the early hours of 10 May 2025, we launched Operation Bunyanum-Marsoos.
Our response was measured, proportionate, and strictly targeted military installations.
Pakistan’s decisive success in neutralising Indian fighter jets, drones, and military targets
is now an undeniable and widely recognized fact—one that cannot be obscured by
misinformation or propaganda.
The objective of our action was clear: to demonstrate Pakistan’s resolve, capability, and
inherent right to defend its territory and people.
Pakistan’s effective counterstrikes have reinforced the credibility of its deterrence and
dispelled any illusions of India’s conventional superiority or its ambitions to impose
hegemony in the region.
While India propagates the notion of establishing a “new normal” in bilateral relations, our
restrained response has reaffirmed that the only acceptable norm is respect for sovereignty
and territorial integrity.
The recent announcement of a Pakistan-India ceasefire is a positive development. We
urge India to adhere faithfully to its implementation.
We once again appreciate the constructive role played by friendly countries in facilitating
the ceasefire. We also reiterate our support for President Trump’s announcement on
engaging with Pakistan and India to seek a resolution to the Jammu and Kashmir dispute.
Let me clarify: the ceasefire was achieved through facilitation of several friendly nations.
Against this backdrop, India’s portrayal of Pakistan as acting out of “despair and frustration”
is entirely baseless. The facts speak for themselves.
I would like to highlight that the Directors General of Military Operations of Pakistan and
India have maintained periodic contact since 10 May 2025. Both sides have agreed on a
structured mechanism for phased de-escalation.
As a goodwill gesture, Pakistan handed over an Indian Border Security Force (BSF)
constable on 14 May 2025. In return, India released a sepoy of the Pakistan Rangers.
At a time when the international community is actively promoting regional peace and
stability, India’s rhetoric reflects a persistent tendency to distort facts, justify aggression,
and cast unwarranted aspersions on Pakistan’s nuclear assets. In contrast, Pakistan, as a
responsible state, remains committed to the ceasefire and to taking necessary steps
toward de-escalation and regional stability.
Given India’s belligerent posture, we call upon our international partners to ensure that
India honours its commitments and refrains from further aggression. Should India resume
hostilities, Pakistan will have no choice but to respond.
In this era, peace is the true strength. The world is not served by theatrical militarism and
grandstanding but by mature leadership, regional cooperation, and respect for international
norms.
Pakistan is a sovereign nation with resilient institutions, a committed populace, and a
globally recognized role in maintaining peace and security. Our commitment to peace must
never be mistaken for weakness. Any future aggression will also be met with full resolve.
We hope India will prioritize regional stability and the well-being of its citizens over narrow,
politically motivated jingoism.
In conclusion, Pakistan firmly believes in peaceful coexistence. We prioritise dialogue and
diplomacy over conflict and confrontation. We have consistently advocated for meaningful
engagement and result-oriented dialogue to resolve all outstanding issues, including the
core dispute of Jammu and Kashmir. A just and peaceful settlement of these disputes
remains indispensable for lasting peace in South Asia.
I thank you
***
(Adeel Bashir, Roze News): President Donald Trump said that both Pakistan and India
icons should go out for a dinner. Can this statement overcome the mistrust between the
two countries?
(Azaz Syed, Geo News): Is Pakistani Prime Minister ready to go out on a dinner with Indian
Prime Minister in Narendra Modi?
(Khawaja Nayyar Iqbal, Media Today): Sir, some positive statements from the President
Donald Trump can be seen regarding the developing situations between the two countries
however, they are being consistently ignored by India. Your comments?
Spokesperson: You would have seen a press release of 11th may in which we welcomed
President Trump's statement. I wish to reiterate our support for the US announcement for
working with Pakistan and India for the settlement of Jammu and Kashmir dispute.
(Muhammad Saleh Zaafir, The News): The conduct of the Indian media during this Indian
aggression was reckless, and they did not report according to the ethics of the journalism.
However, one report suggests that some Indian Plane hit a certain place in Pakistan where
they damaged Pakistan’s nuclear facilities. And consequently, there are some reports in
which India has claimed that there is a radiation leak in that area. Would you like to
comment on that?
(Sardar Amer Hussain Alamgir, Daily Maddar): Pakistan has attacked on nuclear facilities
in India as well, there are also some rumors about radiations leaking. Your comments?
Spokesperson: What I can say iabout radiation leakage in Pakistan s that these reports
are absurd and preposterous. This is part of disinformation and fake news peddled by
Indian media, which has distinguished itself recently with blatant lies and fabrication. As a
responsible nuclear weapon state, Pakistan categorically rejects this irresponsible
reporting with the contempt it deserves. India will be well advised to check such
manufactured falsehoods and stop the fall of its media to new low.
(Kahlid Mehmood, Express News): Sir, is there any deadline decided for ceasefire?
Secondly, after Pahalgam incident, our staff was reduced, both countries did that and what
are updates on Indus Water Treaty and what about visa? Where would all these talks be
held?
(Ali Jaffar, APP): Sir, my question to you is that the response of Indian side, especially the
statements of their foreign minister, Mr. Jaishankar, they don't want to talk on Indus Water
Treaty or even Kashmir dispute despite our assurances. Don't you think it presumes that
they want to maintain the status quo, keep the forces of both the countries on guard, and
no political negotiations at all, and this status quo will again create another chaotic situation
in the region? How will Pakistan respond to this situation?
Spokesperson: I will answer Indus Water Treaty question separately. I will come to the
ceasefire. The Directors General of Military Operations of Pakistan and India have
remained in contact since 10th May 2025, from time to time. Both sides have agreed on a
mechanism for stage-wise de-escalation in the coming days. We believe that
communication and coordination is the best way forward in this regard.
(Anas Mallick, Capital TV): Two quick questions. First again, going back to the Indus
Waters Treaty, the Indian External Affairs Minister has said that it holds the treaty in
abeyance and that there will be no talks on the Indus Waters treaty, and that they won't be
responding to the letter that Pakistan wrote as well. How does Pakistan have to respond
to that? Secondly, China has renamed the disputed territory of Arunachal Pradesh. What
does Pakistan have to say about that?
Spokesperson: We have noted this development regarding China renaming of some areas
within Arunachal Pradesh. Pakistan reiterates its consistent support for China on issues of
its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
On the Indus Water Treaty, we have already stated that India is weaponizing water, which
it must not do. Holding the Indus Water Treaty in abeyance is unilateral and illegal. The
announcement shows India's disregard for the sanctity of the international treaties and
strikes at a fundamental pillar of regional cooperation. It is equivalent to an attack on the
people of Pakistan and its economy. India must immediately restore the normal functioning
of the treaty, as it contains no provision on holding it in abeyance. Pakistan will take all
appropriate steps to safeguard its due share of water.
(Zain Zaman, Agency France-Presses): Sir, after calling international community to
scrutinize Pakistan's nukes, the Defense Minister of India, Mr. Rajnath Singh has a few
hours back, called on IMF to reconsider Pakistan's bailout package?
Spokesperson: Sir, you must have followed the developments related to IMF. The Fund’s
board has already approved Pakistan's package, which was under discussion. India was
the only country which tried to stop it and failed. Again, India trying to politicize an institution
like IMF speaks about its desperation and frustration.
(Shaukat Piracha, Aaj TV): How fragile or solid is the ceasefire in your assessment? The
DG MOs have spoken three to four times, and the Deputy Prime Minister yesterday
informed that this will be up to 18th of May, so why don't the DG MOs agree that this
ceasefire is now permanent, as it has been in the past? My second question is that the
British Foreign Secretary was here today so what particular message is he carrying for
Pakistan? And what message have you shared with him to carry to India when he visits
India later in his second run of his visit?
Spokesperson: Sir, I will not comment or characterize, how the ceasefire is holding, in
terms of its fragility or otherwise. What I can convey to you is that the ceasefire is holding
right now. The Directors General Military Operation have been engaged periodically and
they have agreed on a mechanism for stage wise de-escalation in the coming days, and
we believe that communication and coordination is the best way forward in this regard.
Regarding the British Foreign Secretary's visit, the visit is still ongoing and there are certain
meetings already taking place as we speak. We will be issuing a press release once the
visit concludes. But broadly what I can convey is that Britain remains a very important
partner and friend of Pakistan. We have decades old, multi layered relations which are
really solid. Britain remains an important player on the global stage and in South Asia. It
played a very positive role in the international efforts to deescalate the recent crisis
between Pakistan and India. The detailed press release will be issued once the visit is over
and you will get the full information.
(Aijaz Ahmed, GNN News): Sir, Pakistan’s FM has said that there will be composite
dialogue and his Indian counterpart has said that there will be talks on terrorism only.
Additionally, he said that they have a list which would be handed over to Pakistan and
Pakistan would have to hand over those terrorists who are in that list and they won’t talk
on anything less than that. What is Pakistan’s take on this? Would Pakistan agree to
handover those people?
Spokesperson: This is too speculative at this point in time, but what I can reiterate is that
Pakistan does not shy away from discussions on terrorism. We are a victim of terrorism
and we know India's role in planning and promoting terrorism inside Pakistan and globally.
It also tried to orchestrate assassinations in several other countries. So, whenever the
discussion on terrorism takes place, we are not going to shy away from that as we want
the problem of terrorism to be contained. Again, I would want to highlight that we have
enough material, dossiers and evidence available about India's complicity in promoting and
planning terrorism in Pakistan.
(Zeeshan Yousafzai, Dunya TV): When are two countries expected to come to table for
discussion and what could be the venue? Secondly, Modi in his statement said that if we
hold talks with Pakistan, we will only talk on Azad Jammu and Kashmir and terrorism. Your
comments on that?
(Anwer Abbas, 24 News HD): Sir, Indian Prime Minister Modi in his statement said that
whenever we will talk, we will discuss Pakistani occupied Kashmir. How do we see this
statement? And would this discussion be on whole Kashmir? Need your guidance on this.
(Rashida Sial, Abb Takk): Sir, is there any possibility of talks regarding Indus Water Treaty?
Secondly, we have seen that both countries issued Persona Non Grata to some diplomats
and sent them back. What is the size of our diplomatic Mission in Delhi? Are we thinking
of reducing it?
Spokesperson: I have already answered about the terrorism part that we are a victim of
terrorism. We have enough evidence of India's involvement in terrorism, in promoting
terrorism in Pakistan and also globally, and countries which have been affected by the
Indian sponsored terrorism and extra judicial killings are discussing it with India. We are
open to discuss the issue of terrorism and whenever a comprehensive dialogue takes
place, Kashmir will be on the agenda of such a dialogue. But the discussions about the
venue, agenda and dates, at this point are slightly premature. As our focus is on stabilizing
the situation, consolidate the ceasefire and move towards de-escalation.
(Tahir Khan, NNI News Agency): There are two reports about Afghanistan amidst tensions
between India and Pakistan. Although Pakistan’s stated position is that it does not
comment on the bilateral relations of other countries. However, in yesterday’s statement
of Afghan Acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, we can see that there was
condemnation of Pahalgam incident and India has been adjudged as an important country.
I think during this recent situation, Mr. Muttaqi and Mr. Ishaq Dar had no contact. They
established a contact before when he came back. However, Acting Afghan FM established
contact with India and Indian External Affairs Minister was very satisfied.
Second report alleges that the Afghan Deputy Defense Minister Ibrahim has secretly visited
India, but officially there is neither a denial nor a confirmation from India. Is Pakistan
concerned about the alleged secret visit amid tensions between Pakistan and India?
Spokesperson: The first part of your question contains my answer. It is the policy of
Pakistan not to comment on bilateral relations of other countries. Afghanistan is a
sovereign, independent country. We do not comment on what kind of relations it wants to
pursue with other countries. It is Afghanistan’s sovereign right. At the same time, we urge
our Afghan friends that no matter what kind of relations they have with a third country, their
territory should not be used against Pakistan. How many ministers visit from India to
Afghanistan or from Afghanistan to India, this is a bilateral matter between Afghanistan
and India, and we respect Afghanistan as a neighbor, and as a sovereign, independent
state.
(Azaz Syed, Geo News): Regarding Afghanistan, during this crisis, there was a media
report aired on multiple news outlets, that a missile fell inside Afghanistan, and it was
reported that it was an Indian missile. I wanted to know that did Afghan side contact
Pakistan or Pakistan contacted Afghanistan on that particular development? Any
information on that?
Spokesperson: Sir, about actual operational matters, I will refer you to ISPR and about
specific question I will also check through our system and other departments and get back
if I get any update.
(Almas Hiader Naqvi, Daily Dunya): Sir, as you have said that both sides have agreed to
have a structured mechanism for de-escalation. So, would you like to comment about or
elaborate further on what would be the stages and how it would take place?
Spokesperson: Sir, I have just explained to you the broad direction, as the things are
moving forward. We remain committed to the ceasefire and to restore stability in the region
and then move forward towards resolution of the disputes.
(Syeda Qurat ul Ain, Independent Urdu): Ministry of Foreign Affairs has shared some
details with the parliament yesterday, stating that around 44 Pakistanis have been
convicted in terrorist activities, including conspiracy to attack US officials and other
charges. So according to this document, since all of these people have been convicted,
and it also includes those attacking the US officials, can you share an update on whether
Asif merchant is included in that list, or what is the update on his case? Moreover, the list
does not mention the number of Pakistani prisoners in Indian jails. The last figure that you
had shared was around 770 Pakistani prisoners were languishing in Indian jails. So do you
have that number as well?
Spokesperson: I will have to check. About the first question, I have not seen that response,
or the document. I will have to check both questions and will get back to you.
(Sumaira Khan, Samaa News): Sir, my first question is regarding President World Bank,
Ajay Banga remarks. They are very categorical, but people are confused, seeing two
different versions of Ajay Banga remarks, because Indian side is trying to portray that he
has probably busted Pakistan's propaganda on IWT, Pakistan is on losers end. But from
the Pakistani side, we are seeing totally a different narrative and the extracts of Ajay
Banga’s statement on IWT being mediator or not. Second part of my question is that if you
have any details on, in obviously the privileged diplomatic conversation is something else,
but whatever you can share in your best capability that within the realm of talks with
Afghanistan, on the recent clashes, what exactly had been discussed with Afghanistan?
Because we heard that on the, I think it was May 9, when Pakistan was attacked
simultaneously, some missiles were fired into the territory of Afghanistan as well. So what
exactly we are mutually discussing on that attack on Pakistan and Afghanistan? Thank
you.
Spokesperson: About the first question, what I can tell you is that the President World Bank
Statement is on record. You can listen to it. It is very clear in terms of explaining what IWT
is and what is the World Bank's role. And second, I have already responded to Aizaz
Sahab. This is about the details I will have to check with the Afghanistan desk, but about
the specific operational matters, I will refer you to the ISPR.
(Asghar Ali Mubarak, The Daily Mail International) Pakistan has convincingly
communicated this message from the diplomatic and military battle ground that Kashmir
remains a dispute between India and Pakistan. However, we have witnessed during the
wars of 1947, 1965, 1971 and 1999 that after the battle ceasefires takes place but the
Kashmir issue remains unresolved. The statements emerging from the Indian side suggest
that they have clearly stipulated their objectives in these forthcoming negotiations. So has
the MFA Pakistan also prepared its own SOP for upcoming negotiations with India?
Spokesperson: Thank you for your kind words about Pakistan's diplomacy. It was a whole
national effort, and I must say that it is not just the military and the diplomatic domain, but
also the media in Pakistan, has been responsible and credible compared to the complete
meltdown on the other side, that is what I wanted to say.
About the Kashmir issue and the negotiations, our position has remained consistent, and
I can reiterate our full diplomatic position, once again. Jammu and Kashmir is an
internationally recognized disputed territory, as acknowledged by multiple UN Security
Council resolutions. Numerous UNSC resolutions, particularly resolution 47 and
subsequent ones affirmed the right of the people of Jammu and Kashmir to determine their
own future through a free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices. Pakistan
consistently upholds the inalienable right of the people of Jammu and Kashmir to self
determination in accordance with the UN Charter and the relevant UN Security Council
resolutions. Pakistan underscores the importance of acknowledging and respecting the
legitimate political aspirations of the Kashmiri people who have suffered prolonged denial
of their fundamental freedoms. The Jammu and Kashmir dispute remains a potential
nuclear flashpoint in South Asia, posing a serious threat to regional and global peace and
security. In this backdrop, responsible management and resolution of dispute is critical for
regional stability.
(Abdullah Momand, Dawn News): Thank you, Spokesperson. Following the Phalgam
attack, Modi has leveled baseless allegation against Pakistan. But on the other side, 26
innocent people lost their lives. We call it false flag operation but we condemn and also
ask for investigation of the case. So why there is a contradiction in our policy? We call it
false flag operation and then we are asking investigation. So don’t you think this damages
our case?
Spokesperson: The Foreign Ministry or Minister’s statement has nowhere said that this is
a false flag operation. What we have drawn attention to is analysts pointing to it. And we
have also pointed out in ISPR briefing and some of the other briefings regarding the Indian
case of blaming Pakistan. The speed with which the whole system concluded that Pakistan
was involved and the minutes within which FIR was registered and the text of the FIR itself
is what we have been drawing attention to. If you look at the Indians they have damaged
their own case. The hasty manner they tried to act as a judge, jury and executioner, is
breathtaking. This is the contradiction which we are actually highlighting. There is no
contradiction in our policy. We have extended our condolences notwithstanding the fact
India has never extended condolences to any terrorist attack happening in Pakistan and
then without Pakistan’s consent the UN Security Council statement couldn’t have been
issued. It was Pakistan on board which agreed to the condemnation of this attack. So I
don’t see any contradiction in our policy.
(Naveed Siddiqui, Business Recorder): There is report that India is likely to boost its
defence budget and 50,000 CRs is to be allocated in defence. This proposal is to be
presented in the Parliament in upcoming budget. What is your response?
Spokesperson: For us, it remains a source of concern. It’s a driver of instability in the region
and it gels with the hegemonic impulse which defines and permeates the Indian strategic
policy or Indian South Asia Policy. But we are ready we have demonstrated our capability
to defend ourselves. We don’t have any expansionist designs and our armed forces stand
ready. We are in a position, we’ve demonstrated conventionally also. We are not going to
allow India to be able to use conventional forces in a manner to intimidate or to harm
Pakistan’s fundamental interest. And also what I alluded towards India’s overall hegemonic
impulse, I want to draw your attention to the fact that India doesn’t have good relations with
any of its neigbours and it’s not just Pakistan. They have troublesome relations with the
entire region. It is for the Indian decision makers and Indian polity to think and to forge a
new, new path of peace, which should be a truly win-win proposition for the entire region,
not just for India, but for everyone.
(Shahmeer Baloch, The Guardian): As the Foreign Minister mentioned, about the
constructive role of British Foreign Secretary and the British government for de- escalation,
could you please tell us more about the current visit? Could you please confirm or deny
the British Foreign Secretary visit for playing the role to bring Pakistan and India on the
table, and is London a third party venue on the table to be for India and Pakistan bilateral
dialogues?
Spokesperson: I have answered this question about the third part of your question. These
debates about the venue are premature at this point in time. I wouldn’t enter into any
speculation on this. On the British foreign Secretary's visit, let me recap. UK is a very
important partner and friend of Pakistan. We welcomed its positive role as part of concerted
international efforts to de-escalate the situation. Regarding the details of the visit, we will
be issuing the press release as soon as the visit concludes.
(Ghazala Noureen, Suno TV): Sir, recently Indian Defence Minister gave comments on
Pakistan’s nuclear weapons on which you issued a detailed statement and yesterday, it
was reported in Indian and Pakistani media that IAEA has declared Pakistan’s nuclear
weapons as safe. What are you comments on this? Thank you.
Spokesperson: About the first part of the question, the statement is self explanatory. The
statement is not only preposterous, but exhibits a fundamental misunderstanding about the
role of the IAEA and what role it is supposed to play. Actually, our statement is self
explanatory.
(Noor-e-Aimen Zahra, Talon News,): Thank you, Sir. As India is again and again denying
an independent probe on the Phalgam incident, so what is Pakistan’s stance on it?
Spokesperson: Frankly, this was offered at a very high level, senior most level. The Prime
Minister made the proposal that instead of this rushing to judgment - which was
breathtaking, actually even by Indian standards, in minutes, were casting aspersions on
Pakistan and holding Pakistan accountable there was an effort to help situation deescalate.
If India has any doubts we can go for an impartial investigation, transparent, international
investigation, which India did not accept, rejected it. We can express our regrets over that.
(Zeeshan Syed, Neo TV): Sir, I have two questions. It has been six days since Pakistan –
India ceasefire was enacted and Russia welcomed it today. Did Russia played any role in
the ceasefire?
Secondly, on one hand we faced Pakistan – India tensions and on the other hand,
Pakistan, China and Afghanistan held a trilateral meeting and then within one week, three
important meeting were held. In these meetings, what important matters were discussed?
Can you provide us with details?
Spokesperson: About the second part of the question. As part of Trilateral cooperation
between Afghanistan, China and Pakistan, the Special Representative of Pakistan on
Afghanistan, Ambassador Mohammed Sadiq and China’s Special Representative traveled
to Afghanistan. It was a good opportunity for three sides to exchange views on and
prioritize regional peace, development and security. The visit has helped to sustain
momentum generated by the visit of the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister,
Senator Ishaq Dar to Kabul on 19th April 2025.
Regarding Russian involvement in ceasefire, Russia is again a very important partner and
a friend of Pakistan. Russia has commented on the crisis. You must have seen the public
statements. I won't get into the detail of how many countries or which countries were
involved, but many countries were involved. International community in its entirety wanted
situation to stabilize and de-escalate. And we have noted Russian statements calling for
restraint and de-escalation and we welcome their statement.
(Imran Waseem, Aik News): Sir, when Pahalgam incident happened, under the UN
Charter, it was the right thing for the incident to be investigated through cooperation with
Pakistan. Pakistan offered cooperation to investigate the matter but India refused. Keeping
in view the UN Charter which India violated, does intend to take this matter to the UN?
Secondly, PM announced yesterday that Indian military officials were involved in the Jaffar
Express incident. Did Pakistan arrest anyone and to whom the PM referred to?
Spokesperson: Regarding your first question, actually you have taken my words when I
said earlier that they blamed Pakistan for something very serious and horrendous. We
offered to cooperate through an international, transparent, impartial investigation. India
rejected it, and then what they did in Pakistan is violation of all UN Charter principles and
the fundamental principles of international law, but we had to respond under the article 51
of the UN Charter. India's case does not have any locus standi in legal terms.
About the Jaffar express, I can just go back to my earlier statement about India's
involvement in acts of terrorism in Pakistan, and perhaps it felt emboldened by perpetrating
and planning terrorism in Pakistan and then it decided to go global. So basically, about the
specifics or the operational matters, and of the criminal justice matters, I will have to check.
I do not have information on that because that is Interior Ministry and the Defense Ministry.
I will have to check with that.
(Anwer Abbas, 24 News HD): Recently, former Foreign Secretary of Pakistan, Aizaz
Chaudhary, who is a big name in Pakistan MFA, in an interview stated that Iranian soil is
used against Pakistan and recently, we captured another Indian Intelligence agent like
Kalbushan Yadav whose name was perhaps Chaturvedi? Do you confirm these reports?
Spokesperson: I talked to Aizaz Sahab and he denied this. That is what I will say. About
Kalbhusan Yadav, it is part of record. It is there for everyone to see.
(Muhammad Adnan, Nikkei Asia): Thank you, Mr. Spokesperson. So after the diplomatic
support that Türkiye and Azerbaijan provided to Pakistan, some politicians in India, the
RSS affiliates, they have demanded their government that India should break off diplomatic
relations with Türkiye and Azerbaijan. And a lot of people in India, they are canceling their
tourism and visits to Türkiye and Azerbaijan because of their support provided to Pakistan.
So what's your comment on this behavior?
Spokesperson: It is for something for India to decide. I can say that, it is part of the overall
jingoism and deep frustration in India. Türkiye and Azerbaijan, both remain our very close
friends and partners, long standing relations, and it is not just through the interstate
mechanism, but it is in the heart of Pakistani people. But also I would just want to add one
thing, because Pakistan stood for peace, de-escalations and today the international
community overall supports our position.
(Rashida Sial, Abb Takk): Sir, the way President Trump mediated the ceasefire between
India and Pakistan, a conspiracy theory is circulating which is that the way Trump is stated
to increase trade, he is on a visit to Gulf Countries, he stated to accept Israel in Saudi
Arabia, it is speculated that Pakistan was also demanded to accept Israel through the back
door diplomacy. Please clarify on this.
Secondly, two days ago, Indian Foreign Secretary admitted that an investigation on
Phalgam incident is ongoing. Then under what pretext, Pakistan was attacked by India?
Spokesperson: About the first question, as you said it is a conspiracy theory, so I will not
comment on that.
But about what President Trump said, our statement and what I have earlier said explains
our position. But about the point you raised, I think it was the Indian Ministry of External
Affairs Spokesman. So that further reinforces our point what I have been saying and the
Foreign Ministry has been saying this from the beginning. The haste in which the whole
narrative was built, that decision or the judgment was made that Pakistan was blamed, and
now very responsible official of the Indian Government is saying that investigations are
ongoing. So that demonstrates the contradiction in the Indian position, actually, and it is
almost like a fallacy, basically. This is regrettable and deeply condemnable. And it almost,
if you are logically speaking, it is creating a false pretext for aggression. It tantamounts to
that.
(Saqib Ali Rathore, Daily Kashmir Times): Sir, Ajay Banga stated that World Bank has no
authority to interfere and mediate in conflicts. But request can be submitted by both parties.
Did Pakistan submit an application on IWT?
My second question is when talking about negotiations, Modi has put forward two
conditions. Will Pakistan put forward the condition of involving people of IIOJK in the
process of negotiations?
Spokesperson: Regarding second question, I have already answered it and what I can say
is that our position, which I have read out, remains about the settlement of Kashmir issue
according to the UN Security Council resolutions and aspirations of the Kashmir people.
About the first question, the broad policy, the Foreign Ministry has already articulated on
behalf of the government but about the specifics, I would refer you to Ministry of Water
Resources.
(Aftab Jahan, News One): Developments are taking place in Pak – Afghan relations. In this
context, will the process of repatriation of illegal immigration slow down? Will this decision
be reconsidered and will they not be sent back to Afghanistan?
Spokesperson: Again on Illegal Foreigners repatriation was started in November 2023, and
has since been implemented smoothly. During the visit of the Deputy Prime
Minister/Foreign Minister to Kabul on 19th April, we announced certain measures like
establishing 24/7 hotline to address any case of harassment and creating a committee to
help address claims to the legal properties. We also remain in touch with Afghan brothers
at multiple levels to further facilitate this process.
(Khalid Mahmood, Express News): Shafqat Sahab, ever since ceasefire was enforced
between India and Pakistan, India has started a new arms race and conducting new
defence deals with Israel and the US. What are your comments on this.
Secondly, Israeli drones were used in Pakistan. Will Pakistan raise this issue on any
international forum?
Spokesperson: I have addressed this in responding to a question about the Indian defense
budget. What I can say is that overall, India is pursuing aggressive, or rather hegemonic
policy in the region, and its defense budget reflects that. We remain concerned about the
acquisition and procurement of advanced weaponry by India which creates security
imbalance in the region. At the same time, we remain mindful of the threat. We are
prepared and we are ready, and our forces remain ready to deal with the challenges.
(Sardar Shoukat Mahmood Khan, Islamabad Today): Thank you, Sir. My question after the
ceasefire, the bilateral meeting which is going to take place between Pakistan and India,
will there be any breakthroughs or are the results going to be the same like last time?
President Trump’s statement regarding Kashmir, will Pakistan suggest something
regarding mediation to the USA?
Spokesperson: About President Trump's statement, I have explained, there is a press
release. We welcome that.
Discussion about, the modality, the nature, the timing of dialogue, as I mentioned, is
premature at this stage. And the third point which you referred was, if the negotiations have
not been productive in the past, so would it be result oriented this time. Professional
diplomats are optimists; we are optimistic people. The government remains optimistic. Any
engagement we pursue is with good faith and optimism. So we hope that South Asia can
rise to its potential and overcome the challenges which bedevil peace and security in the
region and in good faith, we will pursue that.
Thank you.
Pakistan Condemns the Remarks of Indian Defence Minister
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-condemns-the-remarks-ofindian-defence-minister
Pakistan strongly condemns the remarks of Indian Defence Minister on its nuclear arsenal,
made today in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K).
These irresponsible remarks reveal his profound insecurity and frustration regarding
Pakistan's effective defence and deterrence against Indian aggression through
conventional means. Pakistan's conventional capabilities are adequate to deter India,
without the self-imposed ‘nuclear blackmail’ that New Delhi suffers.
The comments of India’s Defence Minister also show his sheer ignorance of the mandate
and responsibilities of a specialised agency of the United Nations like the IAEA.
If anything, the IAEA and the international community should be worried about the repeated
theft and illicit trafficking incidents involving nuclear and radioactive material in India.
Just last year, five individuals with a radioactive device reportedly stolen from the Bhabha
Atomic Research Centre (BARC) were found in Dehradun, India. Later, a gang of
individuals was found with illegal possession of a highly radioactive and toxic substance,
Californium, worth US$ 100 million. Three incidents of theft of Californium were also
reported in 2021. These recurring incidents call into question the measures taken by New
Delhi for the safety and security of nuclear and other radioactive material. These incidents
also suggest the existence of a black market for sensitive, dual-use materials inside India.
Pakistan urges a thorough investigation of these incidents and calls upon India to ensure
the safety and security of its nuclear facilities and arsenal.
Islamabad
15 May 2025
139/2025
Pakistan Rejects Provocative and Inflammatory Assertions by the
Indian Prime Minister
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-rejects-provocative-andinflammatory-assertions-by-the-indian-prime-minister
Pakistan categorically rejects the provocative and inflammatory assertions made by the
Indian Prime Minister in his address yesterday. At a time when international efforts are
being made for regional peace and stability, this statement represents a dangerous
escalation rooted in misinformation, political opportunism, and a blatant disregard for
international law. This statement also reflects a propensity to fabricate misleading
narratives to justify aggression.
Pakistan remains committed to the recent ceasefire understanding and taking necessary
steps towards de-escalation and regional stability. This ceasefire was achieved as a result
of the facilitation of several friendly countries which contacted us with a message of deescalation. The portrayal of Pakistan as seeking a ceasefire in “despair and frustration” is
yet another blatant lie.
The Pahalgam attack is being exploited without credible evidence to malign Pakistan,
justify military adventurism by contriving a casus belli, serve domestic political objectives,
deflect attention from rising communal tensions, human rights violations in Indian Illegally
Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, and reinforce a manufactured narrative of a perpetual
external threat. After the unlawful and unprovoked Indian aggression against innocent
Pakistani civilians on false pretext of terrorism, and despite Pakistan’s restraint, India
recklessly provoked the situation further by targeting Pakistan’s military bases, risking an
uncontrollable escalatory spiral.
Indian actions set a dangerous precedent for aggression, dragging the entire region to the
brink of disaster. This reflects the mindset of a revisionist actor that seeks to upend
strategic stability in South Asia without regard for consequences. Moreover, India is
justifying the cold-blooded murder of innocent civilians, mostly women and children, as
well as its highly irresponsible brinkmanship as the “new normal” for the region.
Pakistan totally rejects this assertion. The “normal” remains that no one will be allowed to
challenge the principles and purposes of the UN Charter, as amply demonstrated by
Pakistan in resolutely defending its sovereignty, territorial integrity, as well as the security
of its people.
Make no mistake, we will closely monitor India’s actions and behaviour in this regard in the
coming days. We also urge the international community to do the same.
Consistent with its right to self-defense, Pakistan’s response to Indian aggression was
calibrated and targeted against military installations. Pakistan proved its strength against
Indian military capability and targets. It is now an indisputable and well-known fact which
cannot be denied by misinformation and propaganda.
India’s illegal and unilateral actions are also reflected by its blatant disregard for the
sanctity of binding agreements like the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) that has governed shared
water resources for decades. Pakistan will take all necessary measures to preserve its
rights under the Treaty.
Pakistan is a victim of terrorism, being directly sponsored by India. We have suffered a lot
due to this scourge. Our contributions and sacrifices in the global fight against terrorism
are well known.
Pakistan has always supported the peaceful resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute,
in accordance with the UN Security Council resolutions and the aspirations of the Kashmiri
people. In this regard, we reiterate our support for President Trump’s efforts aimed at the
resolution of this dispute, which remains a source of instability in South Asia.
In this era, peace is the true strength. The world is not served by theatrical militarism and
grandstanding but by mature leadership, regional cooperation, and respect for international
norms.
Pakistan is a sovereign nation with resilient institutions, a committed populace, and a
globally recognized role in maintaining peace and security. Our commitment to peace must
never be mistaken for weakness. Any future aggression will also be met with full resolve.
We hope India will prioritize regional stability and the well-being of its citizens over the
narrow, politically motivated jingoism.
Islamabad
13 May 2025
136/2025
A Staff Member of the Indian High Commission, Islamabad, Declared
as Persona Non Grata
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/a-staff-member-of-the-indian-highcommission-islamabad-declared-as-persona-non-grata
The Government of Pakistan has declared a staff member of the Indian High Commission,
Islamabad, as persona non grata for engaging in activities incompatible with his privileged
status. The concerned official has been directed to leave Pakistan within 24 hours.
The Indian Charge d’Affaires was called to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs today for a
démarche, conveying this decision.
Islamabad
13 May 2025
137/2025
Pakistan Welcomes the Announcement of the Dissolution of Kurdistan
Workers' Party (PKK)
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-welcomes-theannouncement-of-the-dissolution-of-kurdistan-workers-party-pkk
The Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan welcomes the announcement
regarding the dissolution of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). We consider this
development as an important step towards sustainable peace and stability.
Pakistan and Türkiye, bound by deep-rooted fraternal ties, have always supported each
other in all areas of mutual interest including counterterrorism efforts.
Islamabad
12 May 2025
135/2025
UN Secretary-General’s Remarks Regarding the Ceasefire Agreement
and Regional Peace
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/un-secretary-generals-remarksregarding-the-ceasefire-agreement-and-regional-peace-2
Pakistan acknowledges with thanks the statement issued by UN SG Antonio Guterres
@antonioguterres welcoming the recent ceasefire agreement between Pakistan and India.
Pakistan concurs with the Secretary-General’s assessment that this development
represents a positive step toward promoting an environment conducive to durable peace
and stability in South Asia.
In this context, Pakistan reiterates that the just and peaceful resolution of the Jammu and
Kashmir dispute, in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council
resolutions and the legitimate aspirations of the Kashmiri people, remains essential for the
realization of lasting peace in the region.
Pakistan attaches high importance to the role of the United Nations in promoting peace
and regional stability. We remain steadfast in our commitment to constructive and resultoriented dialogue, based on the principles of the UN Charter and international law, with a
view to ensuring peace, security, and development for the peoples of South Asia.
Islamabad
11 May 2025
134/2025
Pakistan Welcomes President Trump’s Statement
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-welcomes-presidenttrumps-statement
Pakistan welcomes the statement by the US President Donald J. Trump regarding
Pakistan-India relations
We acknowledge with appreciation the constructive role played by the United States,
alongside other friendly states, in supporting the recent ceasefire understanding between
Pakistan and India; a step towards de-escalation and regional stability.
We also appreciate President Trump’s expressed willingness to support efforts aimed at
the resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute - a longstanding issue that has serious
implications for peace and security in South Asia and beyond. Pakistan reaffirms that any
just and lasting settlement of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute must be in accordance with
the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions and must ensure the realization
of the fundamental rights of the Kashmiri people, including their inalienable right to selfdetermination.
Pakistan remains committed to engaging with the United States and the international
community in efforts to promote peace, security, and prosperity in the region. We also look
forward to deepening our multifaceted partnership with the United States, particularly in
the areas of trade, investment, and economic cooperation.
Islamabad
11 May 2025
133/2025
Recent Developments and Ceasefire Between India and Pakistan
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/recent-developments-andceasefire-between-india-and-pakistan
Pakistan and India have agreed to reach a ceasefire understanding. However, it is
important to put the relevant developments in the right perspective.
In response to the firing of Brahmos missiles over several locations across the international
border, Pakistan was constrained to retaliate to the unprovoked and unlawful Indian
aggression in exercise of its right to self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter.
Accordingly, Pakistan launched “Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos” early today.
Without a shred of evidence, and disregarding Pakistan’s offer for a neutral, transparent
and credible investigation by international investigators, India launched multiple strikes
during the nights of 7-10 May 2025 which caused loss of innocent lives including women,
children and the elderly. These indiscriminate attacks seriously injured dozens, in addition
to causing damage to infrastructure, including places of worship.
As if the dastardly aggression during the intervening night of 6 and 7 May, breach of
Pakistan’s sovereign airspace through firing of missiles and killer drones, and consequent
human and material losses were already not grave enough, India further endangered the
regional peace and stability by sending additional waves of killer drones in large numbers
across the length and breadth of Pakistan, including the Federal Capital. These killer
drones/loitering munitions and missiles struck multiple civilian and military assets,inflicting
further human and material losses and caused a great sense of insecurity among the
Pakistani people, leading to heightened public demand for an immediate response in selfdefence. Multiple missiles were also fired, targeting our air bases.
Despite facing blatant Indian aggression and persistent provocations, Pakistan exercised
great restraint. However, it was constrained to respond to ensure the safety and security
of its people. Notwithstanding the incessant provocations, our response deliberately
avoided civilian casualties and was precise, proportionate, minutely calibrated, and
manifestly restrained. Only those entities and facilities were targeted which planned,
coordinated, and executed blatant aggression against Pakistan and the cold-blooded
killing of its innocent civilians. These targets also included those Indian airbases from
where Pakistani airbases were subjected to unprovoked missile attacks. Irrefutable
evidence in this regard has already been shared with the international community.
This dangerous conflagration between two nuclear-armed states calls for deeper
introspection and a holistic appraisal by the international community. Far from being a
matter of deep-rooted historic differences between the two neighbouring states in the
volatile region of South Asia, the conflict ought to be seen in the broader context of the
competing geopolitical interests. The negative impact of this competition has been a
constant variable of the regional security paradigm. Hence, any casus belli of the conflict,
contrived or actual, cannot be lumped onto any country without due understanding of the
genesis and root causes of the problems leading to frequent regional conflicts which the
region and the world can ill afford.
Strategic instability in South Asia is a result of the unresolved Jammu and Kashmir dispute.
This dispute has been aggravated by Indian suppression of the legitimate struggle of
Kashmiris for the inalienable right to self-determination and falsely equating it with
terrorism. The scourge of terrorism and extremism is not intrinsic to South Asia. However,
the undesirable and abhorrent debris of Cold War dynamics transformed the socio-political
landscape and shattered regional peace. How the journey of Pakistan and the South Asian
region from a progressive, tolerant, and forward-looking society to the current state was
inducedremains a subject to be explored by all the partners of the Grand Enterprise who
cannot now remain silent spectators.
Despite herculean challenges, Pakistan re-emerged from the ravages of the Cold War as
a resilient state and society that became the bulwark against the spread of terrorism and
extremist ideology, albeit at a monumental cost. Pakistan’s sacrifices and contributions to
the global fight against terrorism, especially post-9/11, are unparalleled. India, probably
sensing an opportunity in Pakistan’s overwhelming commitment to the fight against
terrorism along the Western borders, has repeatedly attempted to exploit this perceived
vulnerability by waging an intense hybrid campaign against Pakistan and orchestrating
terrorism through proxies to destabilise it. India’s military provocations post-9/11 ought to
be seen in the same light. Through such insidious manoeuvres, despite being a victim of
terrorism, Pakistan is continuously being subjected to a two-front situation so that it
remains mired in internal problems and not able to focus on its development as well as the
re-transformation of its society.
Surprisingly, India’s bogey of Pakistan as the ‘epicentre’ of terrorism quickly resurfaces
whenever Pakistan is close to decisively eliminating the menace of terrorism. This vicious
cycle, going on for over two decades, must end now. Any distraction for Pakistan, at this
critical juncture, from its monumental struggle against the scourge of terrorism and the
creeping extremist ideology from its west would be to the great peril of regional peace and
global stability. Pakistan urges the international community to restrain India from using the
sham narrative of the so-calledterrorism from Pakistan in order to secure sustainable
peace. A forward-looking Pakistan needs support, not indifference from the international
community.
India must also realize that its attempts to externalise an internal issue, i.e. organic
resistance to state-sanctioned persecution of minorities, and internalise an external issue,
i.e. Jammu and Kashmir Dispute, are dangerous and destabilising. India must not use the
phenomenon of terrorism as a vehicle to secure policy goals such as the abrogation of
Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood and illegally holding the Indus
Water Treaty in abeyance. Pakistan cannot be coerced by such antics. Pakistan is willing
to engage in constructive diplomacy and comprehensive dialogue with India and seek
resolution of all issues, including the Jammu and Kashmir Dispute, through peaceful
means. The international community must also play its role in preventing further escalation.
All elements of national power remain committed to ensuring the sovereignty and territorial
integrity of Pakistan. Our Armed Forces are obligated to take all measures for defending
the motherland, its citizens, and in contributing to securing Pakistan’s vital national
interests. This obligation is a sacred trust of the proud, resilient, brave, and honourable
people of Pakistan.
For the sake of regional peace and stability, Pakistan mounted a very responsible,
proportionate, and mature response. It is aware of the disastrous consequences of further
escalation between two nuclear states; it is absolutely inconceivable. Any propensity to
tread this dangerous path is fraught with catastrophic consequences for the complete
region and beyond; hence, such an approach ought to be avoided.
Islamabad
10 May 2025
132/2025
Statement by the Spokesperson
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-spokesperson-5
Responding to media queries regarding the statement made by the Foreign Secretary of
India regarding ceasefire violations, the Spokesperson said:
“Pakistan remains committed to faithful implementation of ceasefire between Pakistan and
India, announced earlier today. Notwithstanding the violations being committed by India in
some areas, our forces are handling the situation with responsibility and restraint. We
believe that any issues in smooth implementation of the ceasefire should be addressed
through communication at appropriate levels. The troops on ground should also exercise
restraint.”
Islamabad
10 May 2025
Transcript of the Press Briefing by the Spokesperson on Friday, 09
May 2025
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/transcript-of-the-press-briefing-by-thespokesperson-on-friday-09-may-2025
Assalam-o-Alaikum,
Welcome to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
I welcome you all at the weekly press briefing.
We all are aware of the recent tensions in Pakistan-India relations. India has been violating
Pakistan’s sovereignty since 7 May 2025. Condemnably, the Indian strikes against
Pakistan have endangered the regional peace and stability.
Pakistan unequivocally condemns these illegal acts. The Indian actions are a flagrant
violation of the UN Charter, international law, and established norms governing the interstate relations.
It is most unfortunate that India’s reckless conduct has brought the two nuclear-armed
states closer to a major conflict. India’s jingoism and war hysteria should be a source of
serious concern for the world.
South Asia is home to over one-fifth of the world population. It can ill-afford the
irresponsible actions like the ones being carried out by India.
In the wake of Pahalgam attack, the Indian leadership has once again used the bogey of
terrorism to advance its sham narrative of victimhood, jeopardizing regional peace. We
once again reject any attempt to link the Pahalgam Attack with Pakistan.
A number of countries had called for exercise of restraint during the last two weeks. The
international organizations like the United Nations and Organization of Islamic Cooperation
had also counseled the same. It is highly deplorable that India did not pay heed to these
calls. The international community should hold India accountable for its irresponsible,
unlawful and belligerent conduct.
Yesterday, the Foreign Secretary of India made a number of accusations against Pakistan
in a special press briefing. I wish to set the record straight in regard to the points raised by
him.
First, the assertion that Pakistan escalated the situation through the Pahalgam Attack of
22 April 2025 is totally absurd. Till date, India has not been able to produce any credible
and verifiable evidence of Pakistan’s involvement in the attack. To the contrary, the acts
of aggression committed by India’s armed forces had the approval and support of its entire
government. Thus, it is India that has escalated the situation by violating Pakistan’s
sovereignty and killing civilians. The Pakistani forces did not attack Pahalgam but the
Indian forces did attack multiple locations in Pakistan. Accordingly, Pakistan reserves the
right to take all appropriate measures in its self-defence, as enshrined in Article 51 of the
UN Charter.
Second, on 26 April 2025, the Prime Minister of Pakistan proposed a transparent and
independent probe into Pahalgam Attack through neutral investigators. However, India
chose the path of belligerence and aggression. We are amazed to see the importance that
the Indian Government attaches to the anonymous and dubious social media posts, upon
which it has built the case for The Resistance Front’s involvement in the Pahalgam Attack.
Can any country in the world be allowed to attack another country on the basis of a few
social media posts? India is attempting to act as a judge, jury and executioner.
Third, the investigations in the Mumbai and Pathankot could not make progress due to
India’s non-cooperative attitude. For past several years, we have been asking the Indian
side for physical appearance of the 27 key witnesses of the Mumbai Attacks case before
the trial court in Islamabad. However, India remains reluctant to send them to Pakistan,
even today. As a result, the judicial proceedings remain stalled.
Fourth, while India portrays itself as a victim of terror, it conveniently ignores its own role
in planning, sponsoring and abetting terrorism in Pakistan. It is no secret that India’s
network of targeted assassination and other subversive activities has gone global.
Commander Kulbhushan Jadhav, a serving officer of Indian Navy, is a living proof of the
Indian state’s involvement in terror, subversion and espionage in Pakistan.
At this occasion, I should also remember the victims of Samjhota Express tragedy in which
over 40 Pakistani citizens were killed by Hindu extremists. Most regrettably, the culprits
behind this tragedy, who had links with India’s ruling dispensation, were acquitted. We are
fully justified to ask whether the victims of Samjhota Express tragedy children of a lesser
god?
Fifth, the Indian claims of targeting the terrorists or terrorist infrastructure only, are patently
false. It is a matter of record that the Indian strikes resulted in martyrdom of civilians,
including women and children. It also a matter of public knowledge that some mosques
were destroyed or damaged during the Indian aggression. Similarly, parts of the Neelum
Jhelum Hydroelectric Project were damaged due to the Indian shelling, which is inter alia,
a violation of international conventions. We are well within our right to demand that India
should be held accountable for these crimes.
Sixth, the Indus Waters Treaty has been a successful water-sharing arrangement between
the two neighboring states. The Treaty withstood tests of wars and stand-offs. However,
the current Indian dispensation is bent upon weaponizing water. Holding in abeyance of
IWT is unilateral and illegal. There are no such provisions in the treaty. This action shows
India’s blatant disregard for the sanctity of international treaties. It sets a dangerous
precedent. It strikes at the fundamental pillar of the regional cooperation with profound
implications for regional and global stability. Pakistan is an agrarian economy. Millions of
people are dependent on the waters being regulated by this Treaty. The Indian decision is
equivalent to an attack on the people of Pakistan, and its economy.
For Pakistan, the Indian announcement is of no legal consequence. The Treaty remains in
force and fully binding on parties.
The Indian allegations of Pakistan’s refusal to enter into government to government
negotiations are also incorrect. Pakistan has been continuously engaged with India on the
subject.
Last but not the least, we particularly regret the Indian Foreign Secretary’s indecent and
undiplomatic remarks that Pakistan has been in the habit of lying since its creation in 1947.
We expected better from a diplomat of his status. It is most unfortunate that, nowadays,
India’s ruling dispensation is trying to re-write history, making a number of absurd claims.
India’s founding fathers must be turning in their graves. We wish to remind them that it was
India that took the Jammu and Kashmir dispute to the United Nations. Today, how can it
renege from its own commitments made to the United Nations, to Pakistan and above all,
to the Kashmiri people.
In fact, India remains a permanent factor of instability in the region owing to its hegemonic
ambitions. It has constantly been working to destabilise its smaller neighbours and has
stonewalled all efforts to promote regional cooperation.
I thank you.
(Shaukat Piracha, AAJ News): Sir, how do you assess the war hysteria created by Indian
media, especially last night?
Spokesperson:Piracha Saab, the conduct of Indian media last night was extremely
irresponsible and jingoistic. And frankly, disinformation is one thing, but the conduct of
Indian media yesterday was indeed farcical. Encouraged by the Indian state, its media tried
to create an alarming situation. The repeated pattern of levelling accusations against
Pakistan, without any credible investigation, reflects a deliberate strategy to manufacture
a pretext for aggression and to further destabilise the region. Such actions not only further
endanger regional peace but also reveal a disturbing willingness to exploit misinformation
for political and military ends.
(Anas Mallick, Capital TV):Since you mentioned about the Indus Waters treaty still being
enforced, India has said that it has written a letter with regards to the suspension of the
treaty. How does Pakistan have to respond on that?
Spokesperson: We have responded to the Indian letters by conveying that the treaty
remains fully in force and is binding on the parties. There is no provision in the treaty to
hold it in abeyance. And I may also repeat what I said in my opening remarks; the Indus
Waters Treaty has been successful water sharing arrangement between the two
neighbouring countries. The treaty has withstood tests of wars and standoffs. However,
the current Indian dispensation is bent upon weaponizing water. Holding in abeyance of
Indus water treaty is unilateral and illegal. There are no such provisions in the treaty. This
section shows India's blatant disregard for the sanctity of international treaties. It sets a
dangerous precedent. It strikes a fundamental pillar of regional cooperation with profound
implications for regional and global stability. Pakistan is an agrarian economy. Millions of
people are dependent on the water being regulated by this treaty. The Indian decision is
equivalent to an attack on the people of Pakistan and its economy.
Islamabad
9 May 2025
Statement on Baseless Indian Allegations
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-on-baseless-indianallegations
The Government of Pakistan categorically rejects the baseless and irresponsible
allegations propagated by the Indian media, accusing Pakistan of launching attacks on
Pathankot, Jaisalmer, and Srinagar. These claims are entirely unfounded, politically
motivated, and part of a reckless propaganda campaign aimed at maligning Pakistan.
The repeated pattern of leveling accusations against Pakistan without any credible
investigation reflects a deliberate strategy to manufacture a pretext for aggression and to
further destabilize the region. Such actions not only further endanger regional peace but
also reveal a disturbing willingness to exploit misinformation for political and military ends.
We urge the international community to take serious note of this dangerous behavior and
to counsel India toward restraint and responsibility. Any escalation based on false
pretenses will be met with full resolve and determination to safeguard Pakistan’s
sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Pakistan remains vigilant and firmly committed to peace, but it will not be deterred by
attempts to provoke, intimidate, or mislead and reserves the right to respond to acts of
aggression. These allegations are rejected in the strongest possible terms.
Islamabad
8 May 2025
130/2025
Transcript of the Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister’s Briefing to
the Islamabad-based Ambassadors on Indian Aggression against
Pakistan
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/transcript-of-the-deputy-prime-ministerforeignministers-briefing-to-the-islamabad-based-ambassadors-held-on-7th-may-2025-onindian-aggression-against-pakistan
Excellences,
1. I welcome you to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Today’s briefing is being held to apprise
you of Pakistan’s perspective on the Indian aggression, made during the intervening night
of 6 and 7 May 2025.
2. As you are aware, India carried out multiple strikes in Pakistan and Azad Jammu and
Kashmir. It violated Pakistan’s sovereignty, and endangered regional peace and stability.
3. India launched coordinated missile, air and drone strikes on multiple locations within
Pakistan’s sovereign territory, including Sialkot, Shakargarh, Muridke and Bahawalpur.
Kotli and Muzaffarabad in Azad Jammu and Kashmir were also hit.
4. These unprovoked and unjustified attacks deliberately targeted the civilian areas – on
the false pretext of presence of terrorist infrastructure – resulting in the martyrdom of
innocent men, women, and children. So far, there are reports of deaths of 26 persons and
injury to another 46.
5. The deliberate targeting of civilians, including innocent women and children, is a heinous
and shameful crime.
6. Some mosques were destroyed or damaged due to the Indian strikes. Attacking the
places of worship is a particularly reprehensible step.
7. The Indian action caused serious risk to commercial air traffic, endangering the lives of
thousands of on-board passengers, as a number of passenger flights were in the air at the
time of Indian strikes.
8. Separately, the Neelum-Jhelum hydropower project in Azad Jammu and Kashmir was
targeted in violation of relevant international conventions. The action assumes significance
in the context of India’s decision to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance and the
attendant rhetoric regarding water flows to Pakistan.
9. Pakistan unequivocally condemns these illegal acts as blatant violation of Pakistan’s
sovereignty and territorial integrity. Under the international law, the Indian actions
manifestly constitute acts of war.
10. The Pakistan Air Force engaged with the Indian fighter jets in self-defense, while
bringing down five Indian fighter aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the process.
11. The Indian actions are a flagrant violation of the UN Charter, international law, and
established norms of governing the inter-state relations.
12. It is most unfortunate that India’s reckless conduct has brought the two nuclear-armed
states closer to a major conflict. India’s jingoism and war hysteria should be a source of
serious concern for the world.
13. South Asia is home to over one-fifth of the world population. It could ill-afford the
irresponsible actions like the ones carried out by India, last night.
14. In the wake of Pahalgam attack, the Indian leadership has once again used the bogey
of terrorism to advance its sham narrative of victimhood, jeopardizing regional peace. We
once again reject any attempt to link the Pahalgam Attack with Pakistan.
15. India blamed Pakistan for the Pahalgam Attack, without any verifiable evidence or
credible investigations. On 26 April 2025, the Prime Minister of Pakistan proposed a
transparent and independent probe into this tragic incident through neutral investigators.
Till date, India has not formally responded to this constructive proposal. Instead, it chose
the path of belligerence and aggression.
16. We unequivocally reject the baseless Indian claims of hitting the terrorist infrastructure.
17. Pakistan has been emphatically rejecting the Indian claims about the presence of
terrorist camps on its territory. The international media personnel visited the sites of some
of the so-called “terrorist camps” on 6 May 2025. Similar visits were also planned for 7 May
2025.
18. A number of countries had called for exercise of restraint during the last two weeks.
The international organizations like United Nations and Organization of Islamic
Cooperation had also counseled the same. It is highly deplorable that India did not pay
heed to these calls.
19. We have been apprising our international partners of India’s mal-intentions during the
last two weeks. The Indian actions of the last night demonstrate that our concerns were
genuine.
20. The Prime Minister of Pakistan chaired a meeting of the National Security Committee,
today. The meeting, inter alia, declared that, in accordance with Article51 of the UN
Charter, Pakistan reserves the right to respond to Indian aggression,at a time and place of
its choosing. We remain committed to defending our sovereignty and territorial integrity
with full vigor.
21. The international community should hold India accountable for its irresponsible,
unlawful and belligerent conduct.
I thank you!
Islamabad
8 May 2025
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Briefs the Islamabadbased Ambassadors on Indian Aggression
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/deputy-prime-minister-and-foreign-ministerbriefs-the-islamabad-based-ambassadors-on-indian-aggression
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister (DPM/FM), Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar,
briefed the Islamabad-based Ambassadors on the Indian strikes in Pakistan and Azad
Jammu and Kashmir during the intervening night of 6 and 7 May 2025.
The DPM/FM strongly condemned the Indian aggression, which not only violated
Pakistan’s sovereignty but also jeopardized regional peace and stability. He emphasized
that the Indian actions were carried out in blatant violation of the UN Charter, international
law, and the norms governing the inter-state relations. He rejected the baseless Indian
claims of targeting terrorist infrastructure. He maintained that there was no credible
evidence linking Pakistan with the Pahalgam Attack.
The DPM/FM noted that the Indian leadership had once again used the bogey of terrorism
to promote a fictitious narrative of victimhood. He lamented that India did not pay heed to
the international community’s repeated calls for de-escalation and exercise of restraint. He
urged the international community to hold India accountable for its irresponsible and
reckless conduct.
Islamabad
7 May 2025
129/2025
Demarche to the Indian Chargé d’Affaires
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/demarche-to-the-indian-charge-daffaires
The Indian Chargé d’Affaires was summoned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs today to
receive Pakistan’s strong protest over the unprovoked Indian strikes at multiple locations
across Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir. These strikes resulted in the deaths and
injuries of several civilians, including women and children.
It was conveyed that India’s blatant act of aggression constitutes a clear violation of
Pakistan’s sovereignty. Such actions are in contravention of the UN Charter, international
law, and established norms governing inter-state relations. Pakistan firmly rejected India’s
baseless justifications for its hostile conduct.
The Indian side was warned that such reckless behavior poses a serious threat to regional
peace and stability.
Islamabad
7 May 2025
127/2025
Pakistan Strongly Condemns India’s Blatant Aggression
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-strongly-condemnsindias-blatant-aggression
In an unprovoked and blatant act of war, the Indian Air Force, while remaining within Indian
airspace, has violated Pakistan’s sovereignty using standoff weapons, targeting civilian
population across international border in Muridke, Sialkot and Bahawalpur, and across Line
of Control in Kotli and Muzaffarabad, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. India’s act of aggression
has resulted in martyrdom of civilians, including women and children. This act of
aggression has also caused grave threat to commercial air traffic.
We strongly condemn India’s cowardly action, which is a flagrant violation of the UN
Charter, international law, and established norms of inter-state relations.
In the wake of Pahalgam attack, the Indian leadership has once again used the bogey of
terrorism to advance its sham narrative of victimhood, jeopardizing regional peace and
security. India’s reckless action has brought the two nuclear-armed states closer to a major
conflict.
The situation continues to evolve. Pakistan reserves the right to respond appropriately at
a time and place of its choosing, in accordance with the Article-51 of the UN Charter, and
as enshrined in international law.
The government, armed forces and people of Pakistan stand united in the face of Indian
aggression. They will always act with iron resolve to protect and preserve the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of Pakistan.
Islamabad
7 May 2025
126/2025
Meeting of the UN Security Council on the India-Pakistan Question
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/meeting-of-the-un-security-council-on-theindia-pakistan-question
The United Nations Security Council held closed consultations today under the agenda
item “The India-Pakistan Question”. The meeting was held to discuss the deteriorating
regional security environment, heightened tensions between India and Pakistan and the
situation in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). The meeting was
convened at Pakistan’s request, in view of India’s recent unilateral measures and
provocative public pronouncements that have significantly increased the risk of military
confrontation and threatened regional and international peace and security.
During the meeting, Council members expressed deep concern over the growing risk of
escalation and emphasized the urgent need for restraint and de-escalation. They called for
dialogue and diplomacy to defuse tensions and avoid military confrontation and conflict
and to peacefully resolve issues. Several members underscored that the long-standing
Jammu and Kashmir dispute was the root cause of regional instability, and it must be
resolved in accordance with relevant Security Council resolutions and the aspirations of
the Kashmiri people. Many Council members underlined respect for international law and
obligations with reference to the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty by India.
Briefing Council members, the Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the UN,
Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, highlighted India’s provocative actions, including its
unilateral measures announced on 23rd April and aggressive military posturing. He
cautioned that these actions were unjustified and dangerous, and could lead to
catastrophic consequences.
Council members were apprised of intelligence indicating an imminent threat of kinetic
action by India against Pakistan. It was made clear that Pakistan remained fully prepared
to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity and would exercise its inherent and
legitimate right to self-defence as enshrined in the UN Charter in case of any aggression.
However, Pakistan reaffirmed that it did not seek escalation.
Pakistan categorically rejected India’s baseless allegations linking it to the 22nd April
attack in IIOJK and highlighted that India’s unfounded accusations were made without any
investigation or credible evidence. It was emphasized that such incidents must not be
allowed to be used to justify aggression or violate international law. It was recalled that
India had exploited these incidents in the past to undermine and delegitimize the just
struggle of the Kashmiri people for self-determination and to hide its own state terrorism
and grave violations of human rights in IIOJK. India’s involvement in state-sponsored
terrorism against Pakistan and targeted assassinations in Pakistan and elsewhere was
also highlighted.
Council members were also briefed on India’s unilateral decision to hold in abeyance the
historic Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, a legally binding agreement, brokered by the World
Bank. Pakistan warned that any attempt to obstruct or divert the natural flow of its share of
river waters would constitute an act of war.
Pakistan welcomed calls by the UN Secretary-General to offer his good offices and Council
members for dialogue and de-escalation, and intensified diplomatic efforts to defuse
tensions. It is imperative for the international community, in particular the Security Council,
to act with urgency and responsibility to avoid a conflict that could have catastrophic
consequences for South Asia and beyond.
It is pertinent to mention that the “India-Pakistan Question,” is one of the oldest items on
the agenda of the UN Security Council, under which the UN Security Council remains
seized of the Jammu & Kashmir dispute.
Islamabad
6 May 2025
125/2025
Pakistan decides to formally apprise the UNSC of the Latest
Developments in South Asia
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/pakistan-decides-to-formally-apprise-the-unscof-the-latest-developments-in-south-asia
Pakistan has decided to formally apprise the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) of
the latest developments in South Asia. Pakistan will particularly brief the UNSC on how
India’s aggressive actions, repeated provocations, and inflammatory rhetoric pose a
serious threat to regional and global peace and stability.
It will also highlight India’s unlawful and unilateral attempt to put the Indus Waters Treaty
in abeyance—a clear violation of its international obligations.
Pakistan will call upon the UNSC to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance
of international peace and security by taking appropriate measures to address these
concerning developments.
05 May, 2025
Islamabad.
123/2025
OIC-IPHRC Condemns Rising Islamophobia and Reprisal Attacks in
India and IOJK
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/oic-iphrc-condemns-risingislamophobia-and-reprisal-attacks-in-india-and-iojk
The OIC Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC) has expressed
grave concern over the alarming surge in Islamophobic rhetoric, hate-fueled violence, and
targeted attacks against Muslim communities in India and Indian Occupied Jammu and
Kashmir (IOJK), particularly in the wake of the recent tragic incident in Pahalgam.
Condemning the scapegoating of Muslims and the far-right nationalist incitement of
communal violence, the Commission underscored that such actions constitute serious
violations of international human rights law. It urged the Government of India to ensure accountability, uphold the rights of over 200 million Muslims, and end the cycle of hate and impunity.
The Commission called on the United Nations and the international community to monitor
the situation closely, push for independent investigations, and protect the fundamental
freedoms of Muslims in India and IOJK. Reaffirming its stance on Kashmir, the IPHRC also
reiterated the need for a UN-led fact-finding mission and emphasized the Kashmiris' right
to self-determination in line with relevant UN and OIC resolutions.
05 May, 2025
Islamabad
122/2025
Statement by the Spokesperson in Response to Media Queries about
the Availability of the Wagha Border Crossing for Pakistani Citizens
Returning from India
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-spokesperson-in-response-tomedia-queries-about-the-availability-of-the-wagha-border-crossing-for-pakistanicitizens-returning-from-india
Responding to media queries about the availability of the Wagha border crossing for
Pakistani citizens returning from India, the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
stated:
The Indian decision to revoke visas of Pakistani citizens is creating serious humanitarian
challenges. Many patients, with fragile health, had to return to Pakistan without completing
their treatment. Furthermore, there are reports of families being split and children being
separated from one of their parents.
The last date to cross over through the Wagah-Attari border was April 30, 2025. In that
context, we are aware of the media reports indicating that some Pakistani nationals are
stranded at Attari. We are open to receiving our citizens in case the Indian authorities allow
them to cross the border from their side.
The Wagha border will remain open for Pakistani citizens in the future as well.
Islamabad
1 May 2025
Visit of OIC Secretary General’s Special Envoy for Jammu and Kashmir
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/visit-of-oic-secretary-generals-special-envoyfor-jammu-and-kashmir
The OIC Secretary General’s Special Envoy for Jammu and Kashmir, Ambassador Yousef
M. Al Dobeay, visited Pakistan from 19-22 April 2025.
During the visit, the Special Envoy and his delegation held meetings with the Minister for
Kashmir Affairs, Gilgit Baltistan, States and Frontier Regions, Engineer Amir Muqam,
Chairman Parliamentary Committee on Kashmir, Rana Muhammad Qasim Noon, and
Foreign Secretary, Amna Baloch.
During these meetings, the Pakistani leadership appreciated OIC’s steadfast support for
the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The Special Envoy was apprised of the systematic
human rights violations in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and the
destabilizing impact of India’s belligerent rhetoric and retrogressive actions. It was
underscored that the Kashmiris placed their trust in the OIC and the Muslim Ummah for
proactive assistance in realization of their fundamental rights and freedoms, and the
peaceful resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions.
The Special Envoy also held a number of other meetings in Islamabad and Muzaffarabad.
Ambassador Al- Dubeay highlighted that Palestine and Jammu and Kashmir continue to be the foremost priorities on the OIC’s agenda. He also discussed ways to help alleviate the sufferings of the Kashmiri people.
This was the fifth visit of Ambassador Al Dobeay to Pakistan and Azad Jammu and
Kashmir, following his appointment as the OIC Secretary General’s Special Envoy for
Jammu and Kashmir. The visit was also a reaffirmation of the OIC’s commitment to the
Kashmir cause.
Islamabad
24 April 2025
117/2025
Statement by the Spokesperson Regarding Attack in Anantnag district
of the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/statement-by-the-spokesperson-regardingattack-in-anantnag-district-of-the-indian-illegally-occupied-jammu-and-kashmir 

Responding to media queries concerning the attack in Anantnag district of the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, the Spokesperson said:
We are concerned at the loss of tourists’ lives in an attack in Anantnag district of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir. We extend our condolences to the near ones of the deceased and wish the injured a speedy recovery.
Islamabad
23 April 2025